What are the main arguments from supporters and critics of SIMD-0228?

The main arguments from supporters and critics of SIMD-0228 are as follows:

Supporters' Arguments:

1. Reduction of Sell Pressure: SIMD-0228 is believed to reduce the sell pressure on the market, which can help stabilize prices.
2. Boosts Long-Term Value: Proponents argue that the proposal can enhance the long-term value of the asset.
3. Pragmatic Emissions: Supporters highlight that pragmatic emissions allow Solana to manage inflation more effectively.

Critics' Arguments:

1. Impact on Small Validators: Critics contend that SIMD-0228 could severely impact small validators, potentially harming their viability.
2. Centralization of Power: There are concerns that the proposal may centralize power within the network, undermining its decentralized nature.
3. Focus on Wrong Metrics: Detractors warn that the proposal might prioritize the wrong metrics, which could hinder the growth of SOL.
4. Over-Reliance on MEV Income: Some critics argue that an over-reliance on Miner Extractable Value (MEV) income could introduce centralization risks and compromise the network's decentralized ethos.

These arguments reflect the ongoing debate surrounding SIMD-0228 and its potential implications for the Solana network.